|
![]() |
| Mock Drafts | Baseball Commissioner | Football Commissioner | More |
New Idea |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Topic: New IdeaPosted: 19 Jan 2013 at 7:12am |
|
I just got a new idea. It is probably not new to most fantasy folk around here, but it is new to me. I am trying to find different ways to evaluate players to help determine their draft rankings. I normally take projections from numerous sources (Bill James, Rotowire, fantasy magazines, various online sources, my own guestimates) and then set up my draft board. This has worked well for me in the past, but i want to try and find new ways to evaluate players to determine their overall worth when it comes to a certain draft order.
So what i am going to do is take the first 25 players that i deem roster-able for each position (50 for OF and SP) and put their Bill James projections into an Excel spreadsheet. Then I will average each 5x5 scoring category to find the mean. That will tell me what the "average" player at that position is expected to produce. IT will give me a baseline for what i am looking for. If i see that a guy is above average in multiple categories, it might make him more valuable than a guy who is elite in 1 and average to below in the rest. I don't know if this will be helpful or not, but i am going to do it. Worst-case scenario is it gets the top players at each position in an organizable spreadsheet for me to view all together. Any thoughts??? I am not crazy about using Bill James, as i think most of his predictions are optimistic, but his predictions are easy to find and use. |
|
![]() |
|
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 7:58am |
|
each player gets a (+/-) value at each category based on their distance from the mean, and then you find the sum of those values to give an overall value. Then rank them that way....I am going to try that first
Edited by astrosfanatic - 19 Jan 2013 at 7:59am |
|
![]() |
|
LABLUE
Senior Member
Joined: 04 May 2001 Posts: 4106 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 8:04am |
|
I have read some do this. I sort of do this but off the top of my head. I do all my own projections and rankings. Then I rank them how I like. Then I put them in tiers for each position. So I might have 5 1b in tier one. Then 8 in tier two. I do like to look at others ranking and talk with you guys here on things but I sill always go with what I think over others. Even if 50 so called experts say they like player A over player B I will still go player B if I think he is better.
|
|
![]() |
|
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 8:13am |
|
Oh i definitely agree. I will always trust my gut over numbers or others predictions. As much as we like to think that the stats are the determining factors in a players future success, there is always the human factor that has to be determined in as well. Injuries and proneness to slumps are things that will never be factored by computers listing projections. Most of these analysts use computers to generate projections and then give an eye test to check for reasonableness. Doesn't always result in the best projections.
Edited by astrosfanatic - 19 Jan 2013 at 8:14am |
|
![]() |
|
LABLUE
Senior Member
Joined: 04 May 2001 Posts: 4106 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 8:29am |
|
Projections are updated on this site, cbs, rotochamps if you are looking for some.
|
|
![]() |
|
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 9:03am |
|
I've already done this for Catchers and Outfielders. Interesting results
Top 5 Catchers: 1. Posey 2. Mauer 3. Santana 4. J. Montero 5. Perez I guess this system leans very heavily towards the more balanced players. So i don't know if it will work for making draft boards. I don't know. My brain is racing a million miles an hour trying to understand the data that i am creating. |
|
![]() |
|
copemoney
Senior Member
Joined: 26 Feb 2009 Posts: 223 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 9:28am |
I tier them as well but in dollar values. This way, when a guy gets called, I know how many of those guys are left plus the max amount I want to pay for them. AF- this looks like good idea, will be interested to see how it turns out |
|
![]() |
|
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 9:32am |
|
it is blowing my mind right now. Just finished 1B. Did you know according to the projections an average 1B will put up 28 HR/ 82 R/ 95 RBI/ .277 BA? uhhhhh, that's crazy.
|
|
![]() |
|
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 10:20am |
|
I am finding that this system penalizes guys who have poor batting averages. Curtis Granderson comes in at 3 because of a -35 value in batting average. There's no way a guy like De Aza (9) is more valuable than Granderson. However, if you are looking for a balanced player, De Aza isn't a bad fit. His low RBI totals are balanced by his high average, and his low HR totals are balanced by his high SB numbers. And all the runs he scores are gravy.
|
|
![]() |
|
negan50
Groupie
Joined: 26 Feb 2011 Posts: 91 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 3:56pm |
|
Your system reminds me of Baseball Monster. They value and compare categories but I don't know the criteria. No one mentioned Monster...any love here for those guys?
I see that NFBC is starting to publish ADP numbers for this year. Seems like that crowd would generate pretty good numbers given the level and commitment of the players. Thoughts? |
|
![]() |
|
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 4:04pm |
|
I've never done Baseball Monster before. I imagine NFBC would require some sort of subscription for access to those ADP numbers?
|
|
![]() |
|
negan50
Groupie
Joined: 26 Feb 2011 Posts: 91 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jan 2013 at 4:23pm |
|
I"m sure I have to pay for a slot to enter mocks and be current but they are posting numbers in Excel right here on Rotowire under Blogs. I've been looking at them to help with my draft choices this week. They post the trends for each player from past couple of weeks. Fairly small sample but I agree with idea that they might be the best look right now as these are generally serious money and pride players. I am glad to have gotten opportunity join y'all in this Yahoo draft as I getting a glimpse of the time and energy you devote to the craft. I expect to learn a thing or two....hope the lesons are not to painful.
|
|
![]() |
|
astrosfanatic
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 670 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 3:30am |
|
Player TOTAL
1 Buster Posey 110 2 Joe Mauer 76 3 Carlos Santana 51 4 Jesus Montero 36 5 Salvador Perez 34 6 Miguel Montero 22 7 Yadier Molina 20 8 Matt Wieters 19 9 Jonathan Lucroy 18 10 Brian McCann 18 11 Mike Napoli 8 12 Wilin Rosario 6 13 Alex Avila -10 14 A.J. Pierzynski -14 15 Ryan Doumit -15 16 John Jaso -22 17 Carlos Ruiz -35 18 J.P. Arencibia -44 19 Jarrod Saltalamacchia -53 20 A.J. Ellis -64 21 Welington Castillo -66 22 Tyler Flowers -96 I like these results for catcher for a few reasons: 1) It shows how deep the Catcher position really is this year. 12 guys have a positive value. 2) Yadier Molina is not the 3rd best catcher. He is good! But his FB/HR% was nearly triple what it has been historically for him. He has to regress there significantly. 3) Buster Posey is in his own class. Mauer is close, but he is still a significant margin away |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump |