Login: Sign up now! or
call 888-201-3057
| Help | Why Subscribe?
Yahoo! SportsFoxSportsESPN
  Mock Drafts | Baseball Commissioner | Football Commissioner | More
Search for Player:      
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar

Trade Help.

 Post Reply Post Reply
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
rschlad04 View Drop Down

Joined: 11 Oct 2010
Posts: 33
  Quote rschlad04 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Trade Help.
    Posted: 11 Oct 2012 at 5:07pm
Having troubles with a trade in my keeper league, we can keep up to 3 players.

Team A (0-5) Trades Aaron Rodgers, and Owen Daniels
Team B (3-2) for
Mikel LeShoure (8th round keeper next season) and Wes Welker

Am I wrong in thinking this isn't remotely fair?

Team A:

QB: Rodgers, Stafford
RB: Trent Richardson, Deangeolo Williams, Blount, LaRod Stephens Howling, Brandon Bolden
WR: Marshal, Andrew Hawkins, Jeremy Kerley, Kendell Wright, Golden Tate
TE: Gates, Daniels

wow is that team bad! lol

Team B:

QB: Cam Newton, Josh Freeman
RB: Alfred Morris, Demarco Murray, Sproles, LeShoure, Powell, Hillman
WR: Megatron, Roddy White, Reggie Wayne, Wes Welker, Garcon
TE: Gresham

This team had some great keepers to start the season, and made a nice trade to get a very solid roster. Here is the keeper value for his players next season. Alfred Morris (7th), Cam Newton (10th), Murray (9th) Sproles (6th) LeShoure (8th)

I hate to be a commisioner that vetoes anything but collusion, but I feel without a salary cap, there has to be some kind of system of checks and balances in the league for owners to want to return.

I definitely see how this helps both teams out, but I feel Team A is selling much to low on Rodgers. Welker basically has no value to him as he is already all but out of contention. So I see it as Rodgers for LeShoure.

Team B is basically trading away his 4th best WR, and 4 or 5th best keeper for an elite QB, and to this point, top 5 TE. Would a trade like this hurt the balance of the league too much, do you think I should even be concerned about that? Any input would be great, thanks.
Back to Top
pmissner View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 Jul 2012
Posts: 184
  Quote pmissner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Oct 2012 at 6:45pm
If it is not collusive and you, as commish, can see how the trade helps the team giving up Rodgers, I don't think you can veto it. My belief is that vetoing is only for collusion. You can't veto stupidity.
Back to Top
STEELCITY10 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 1081
  Quote STEELCITY10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Oct 2012 at 8:07pm
I agree with pmissner,the trade helps both teams and the 0-5 team still has Stafford while his WR are bad.I personally would trade Stafford and hold on to Rodgers
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump